 |
 |
Frequently Asked Questions
- I own several acres of undeveloped land
on which I’d like to build some houses. How do I
divide the land into different parcels so I can
sell the houses once they’re built?
To divide your land into parcels, generally
you must meet requirements of both state law and
local ordinances for subdivisions. You submit an
application to the appropriate city or county
land use authority, which is sent for comment to
state and local agencies who have jurisdiction
(e.g., public works, utilities, fisheries
agencies, transportation agencies, etc.).
Usually, you have an opportunity to work with
the staff of the local government to resolve any
issues that may come up. Typically, the staff
recommends that the application be approved
subject to a number of conditions. After public
notice and a hearing, the planning commission or
hearing examiner recommends that the application
be approved with conditions or disapproved. The
final decision is left to the local government’s
legislative authority (e.g., city council,
county commissioners, etc.).
- The county recently passed a critical
areas ordinance that will prevent me from
building on about 25 percent of my land because
it is within a certain distance of a creek. This
ordinance will cause me to lose a lot of money I
would have made in developing the property. Does
the county have to pay me for my loss?
Probably not. If a county ordinance
completely takes away your ability to use your
property in any way, the county must pay you the
fair market value of your property. However, if
the ordinance merely limits your use (or even
prohibits all use, but only as to a portion of
your property), the county is not required to
pay you anything – even though your property has
lost value as a result of the ordinance. This
may change after the November 2006 election if
Washington voters approve the Property Fairness
Initiative sponsored by the Washington Farm
Bureau.
- I had my property surveyed, and found
that my neighbor’s septic system actually is
located on my land. When I told her about this,
she said that she installed the septic system 15
years ago, thinking it was on her land. She
apologized for the mistake, but said it would be
too expensive to put in a new septic system. The
next day she called me to say that her lawyer
told her that she owned the property now because
of something called “adverse possession.” What
does that mean?
Adverse possession is a rule of law that
transfers ownership of property to a person who
openly used the land for 10 years or more as
though the land were rightfully hers all along.
For your neighbor to claim ownership of land by
adverse possession, she does not necessarily
need to show that she knew that the land was
yours. It is enough for her to show that she
acted as though she were the rightful owner. On
the other hand, her use of the land must be
known to you – or obvious enough that you should
have known of her use. In the case of an
underground septic system located on undeveloped
land, if you don’t have actual knowledge of the
location of the system, your neighbor probably
cannot successfully establish adverse
possession. There are other legal requirements
that must be met that will depend on the facts
of each case. Don’t assume that your neighbor’s
lawyer has the last word on this.
- The power company has some transmission
lines running across my property in a
right-of-way easement. The other day I saw some
workers installing underground cable alongside
the powerlines. They told me it was fiber optic
cable, and that the cable company had permission
from the electric company to use the
right-of-way. Nobody asked my permission to
install fiber optic cable, and nobody paid me
for this use of my land. Can they do this?
The power company’s right-of-way easement
probably describes the uses that are permitted
in the right-of-way. If fiber-optic cable is
specifically mentioned, the power company does
not need additional permission from you, and it
probably can lease use of the right-of-way to
the cable company. However, if fiber-optic cable
is not specifically mentioned, it is a different
question. Unfortunately, at the present time,
there is no definite answer. Recently, the
Washington Supreme Court said that a cable
company could not install cable in a railroad
right-of-way without first compensating the land
owner; however, this decision was based on some
unique features of the law applicable to
railroad rights-of-way. It is probably worth
your while to at least try to negotiate payment
of compensation by the cable company.
- When I started clearing my land for
development, I found a trash heap with old,
rusty paint cans and some 55-gallon drums.
They’re all empty, and there are no stains on
the ground surface. My contractor said I needed
to report this to the Department of Ecology. Is
he right?
It depends on just how empty those paint cans
and drums really are. If they do not contain
even a trace of the original product or waste,
and you have no information that the property is
contaminated, you might not be required to make
a report. However, it there is any trace of
residual petroleum or other chemicals, generally
you need to report your finding to the
Department of Ecology within 90 days. It would
be prudent to coordinate with department staff
before continuing your clearing activities in
the vicinity of the trash heap.
|
|